<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 565 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288245</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court treated Collector of Central Excise v. Ram Body Builders as controlling precedent and found no basis to depart from that earlier decision. Applying stare decisis, it disposed of the present appeals in line with that precedent and dismissed them accordingly. The operative basis for the result was the Court&#039;s acceptance that the earlier ruling governed the issues raised in the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 16:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 565 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288245</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court treated Collector of Central Excise v. Ram Body Builders as controlling precedent and found no basis to depart from that earlier decision. Applying stare decisis, it disposed of the present appeals in line with that precedent and dismissed them accordingly. The operative basis for the result was the Court&#039;s acceptance that the earlier ruling governed the issues raised in the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>