<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 572 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395539</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing, justifying the depreciation claim on the intangible asset as capital in nature, and upholding the classification of agricultural land for exemption purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 11:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 572 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395539</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing, justifying the depreciation claim on the intangible asset as capital in nature, and upholding the classification of agricultural land for exemption purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>