<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 571 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that the parties were not associated enterprises under section 92A, thereby invalidating the penalties imposed under sections 271AA and 271BA. The decision was based on the legislative intent behind section 92A(2), binding judicial precedents, and the principle that lower courts must follow higher judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 11:23:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 571 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that the parties were not associated enterprises under section 92A, thereby invalidating the penalties imposed under sections 271AA and 271BA. The decision was based on the legislative intent behind section 92A(2), binding judicial precedents, and the principle that lower courts must follow higher judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>