<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 565 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395532</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application due to lack of specific facts and repetitive prayers, emphasizing the impermissibility of forum shopping. The applicant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 10,000, to be deposited with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for COVID relief. The court condemned the abuse of process and reiterated the importance of presenting new facts for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 565 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395532</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application due to lack of specific facts and repetitive prayers, emphasizing the impermissibility of forum shopping. The applicant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 10,000, to be deposited with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for COVID relief. The court condemned the abuse of process and reiterated the importance of presenting new facts for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>