https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288222 An appellate disciplinary order under the Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980 was held not to fail merely because it did not cite the precise sub-rule, where the rules otherwise conferred wide power to remand the matter for further inquiry and pass appropriate orders. The omission was treated as non-jurisdictional because the authority's power could be sustained under Rule 25 and no prejudice was shown, since the defence could still be tested in a regular inquiry. The Tribunal erred in treating the omission as fatal, and the remand direction was restored. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2020 16:54:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288222 An appellate disciplinary order under the Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980 was held not to fail merely because it did not cite the precise sub-rule, where the rules otherwise conferred wide power to remand the matter for further inquiry and pass appropriate orders. The omission was treated as non-jurisdictional because the authority's power could be sustained under Rule 25 and no prejudice was shown, since the defence could still be tested in a regular inquiry. The Tribunal erred in treating the omission as fatal, and the remand direction was restored. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 06 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288222