<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 553 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to compute disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) using net interest and to recompute disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D by applying the theory of apportionment of expenditure and considering only shares yielding dividend income. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 14:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 553 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to compute disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) using net interest and to recompute disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D by applying the theory of apportionment of expenditure and considering only shares yielding dividend income. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>