https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395509 An interim restraint against levying demurrage, ground rent, detention charges and similar charges during the COVID-19 lockdown was refused because the petitioner showed no prima facie enforceable right to injunction. The Court found that the circulars, advisories and directions relied upon were addressed to Major Ports and related entities, and did not operate on the record as binding directions against the private CFS operators in issue. It also noted that the charge structure between the CFS operators and their customers was contractual, and that some concessions had already been extended voluntarily. Balance of convenience and irreparable loss were also not established, so interim interference was declined. en-us Fri, 22 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2020 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395509 An interim restraint against levying demurrage, ground rent, detention charges and similar charges during the COVID-19 lockdown was refused because the petitioner showed no prima facie enforceable right to injunction. The Court found that the circulars, advisories and directions relied upon were addressed to Major Ports and related entities, and did not operate on the record as binding directions against the private CFS operators in issue. It also noted that the charge structure between the CFS operators and their customers was contractual, and that some concessions had already been extended voluntarily. Balance of convenience and irreparable loss were also not established, so interim interference was declined. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395509