https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395504 A party that files a revision must remain vigilant about hearing dates and prosecute the matter diligently. Where the record shows repeated listings and the party does not appear on the fixed dates, the revisional authority may treat the revision as unattended and dismiss it for want of prosecution, even if service of notice is not affirmatively established on the record. The High Court found no illegality, impropriety, or material irregularity in the dismissal and declined interference in writ jurisdiction because the petitioner had not shown due diligence in pursuing the revision. en-us Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2020 13:20:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395504 A party that files a revision must remain vigilant about hearing dates and prosecute the matter diligently. Where the record shows repeated listings and the party does not appear on the fixed dates, the revisional authority may treat the revision as unattended and dismiss it for want of prosecution, even if service of notice is not affirmatively established on the record. The High Court found no illegality, impropriety, or material irregularity in the dismissal and declined interference in writ jurisdiction because the petitioner had not shown due diligence in pursuing the revision. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395504