https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395502 Where an effective statutory revision remedy is available under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, writ appellate interference is not warranted if the impugned order discloses no jurisdictional error, violation of natural justice, or breach of statutory provisions. The challenge to orders issued under Section 56(1) was therefore declined in intra-court appeal, with the court noting that the classification dispute and the propriety of the Section 56(1) power required merits-based scrutiny better suited to the revisional authority. The appellant was left to pursue revision and seek consequential interim reliefs. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2020 13:18:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395502 Where an effective statutory revision remedy is available under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, writ appellate interference is not warranted if the impugned order discloses no jurisdictional error, violation of natural justice, or breach of statutory provisions. The challenge to orders issued under Section 56(1) was therefore declined in intra-court appeal, with the court noting that the classification dispute and the propriety of the Section 56(1) power required merits-based scrutiny better suited to the revisional authority. The appellant was left to pursue revision and seek consequential interim reliefs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395502