<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1406 - KERALA HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288217</link>
    <description>Orders passed under Section 56(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were examined for jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, and contravention of Section 56(2). The Court found no such defect and held that there was no basis to invoke Article 226 jurisdiction. It also noted the availability of an effective revisional remedy under Section 59, and the writ petition challenging the orders was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 13:09:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1406 - KERALA HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288217</link>
      <description>Orders passed under Section 56(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were examined for jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, and contravention of Section 56(2). The Court found no such defect and held that there was no basis to invoke Article 226 jurisdiction. It also noted the availability of an effective revisional remedy under Section 59, and the writ petition challenging the orders was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>