https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288211 The appellant sought interest on the amount deposited in compliance with the Tribunal's order. The appellant argued for interest under Section 35 FF from a specific date. The Commissioner (Appeals) followed the Delhi High Court's interpretation, denying interest before a certain period. The Assistant Commissioner refunded the deposit but did not address interest under Section 35 F. The appeal was dismissed in line with the Delhi High Court's ruling, finding no merit. en-us Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2020 17:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288211 The appellant sought interest on the amount deposited in compliance with the Tribunal's order. The appellant argued for interest under Section 35 FF from a specific date. The Commissioner (Appeals) followed the Delhi High Court's interpretation, denying interest before a certain period. The Assistant Commissioner refunded the deposit but did not address interest under Section 35 F. The appeal was dismissed in line with the Delhi High Court's ruling, finding no merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288211