https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288214 An interim order that stayed a relieving order and directed continuation in service was treated as having granted the substantive relief at an interlocutory stage, making the Tribunal's approach unsustainable. The SC held that such interim directions could not effectively decide the original application on merits, and the High Court's affirmation was also not sustainable. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for expeditious disposal on merits, with liberty to file reply and rejoinder. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2020 13:09:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288214 An interim order that stayed a relieving order and directed continuation in service was treated as having granted the substantive relief at an interlocutory stage, making the Tribunal's approach unsustainable. The SC held that such interim directions could not effectively decide the original application on merits, and the High Court's affirmation was also not sustainable. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for expeditious disposal on merits, with liberty to file reply and rejoinder. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288214