https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288204 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is not justified where the trial court's assessment of evidence is a reasonably possible view, even if the appellate court prefers another view. The trial court had relied on the suspicious nature of the alleged dying declarations, inconsistencies in the prosecution case, unexplained injuries on the accused, and surrounding circumstances. As that appreciation of evidence was held to be reasonable, the High Court should not have substituted its own view and reversed the acquittal. The conviction was set aside and the trial court's acquittal restored. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2020 11:40:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288204 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is not justified where the trial court's assessment of evidence is a reasonably possible view, even if the appellate court prefers another view. The trial court had relied on the suspicious nature of the alleged dying declarations, inconsistencies in the prosecution case, unexplained injuries on the accused, and surrounding circumstances. As that appreciation of evidence was held to be reasonable, the High Court should not have substituted its own view and reversed the acquittal. The conviction was set aside and the trial court's acquittal restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288204