<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1717 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the AO to apply a 0.15% net profit rate on the bank deposits and deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c). The judgment emphasized consistency with prior Tribunal decisions and the principle that penalties should not be imposed on estimated income assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 17:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1717 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the AO to apply a 0.15% net profit rate on the bank deposits and deleting the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c). The judgment emphasized consistency with prior Tribunal decisions and the principle that penalties should not be imposed on estimated income assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>