<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 1003 - CEGAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288189</link>
    <description>Demands arising from shortages found in annual stock verification are subject to the limitation period under Section 11A. Where the show cause notice is issued beyond the normal six-month period and does not allege suppression of facts, misstatement, collusion, or fraud, the extended limitation period cannot be invoked. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the recovery as time-barred and upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 16:23:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 1003 - CEGAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288189</link>
      <description>Demands arising from shortages found in annual stock verification are subject to the limitation period under Section 11A. Where the show cause notice is issued beyond the normal six-month period and does not allege suppression of facts, misstatement, collusion, or fraud, the extended limitation period cannot be invoked. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the recovery as time-barred and upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>