<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 568 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding it back to the Commissioner for a merit-based decision without requiring any pre-deposit. The Tribunal found that the service received was &quot;Scientific or Technical Consultancy,&quot; not &quot;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service,&quot; warranting a waiver of pre-deposit. It emphasized the importance of fair consideration without the burden of pre-deposit requirements, ensuring compliance with the law and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 11:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 568 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding it back to the Commissioner for a merit-based decision without requiring any pre-deposit. The Tribunal found that the service received was &quot;Scientific or Technical Consultancy,&quot; not &quot;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service,&quot; warranting a waiver of pre-deposit. It emphasized the importance of fair consideration without the burden of pre-deposit requirements, ensuring compliance with the law and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>