<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 706 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288183</link>
    <description>A society engaged in training candidates for Central and State Government services was treated as carrying on non-commercial activity, not a profit-oriented Commercial Coaching Service, for the stay application. The Tribunal relied on the organisation&#039;s non-profit character, balance sheet material, and income-tax exemption evidence to conclude that the service tax dispute did not justify insisting on pre-deposit at that stage, and it granted waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery until final disposal. It also directed out-of-turn hearing, noting that the amount in dispute crossed the prescribed monetary threshold, and required the Commissioner to file comments and a counter to the appeal grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 11:13:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 706 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288183</link>
      <description>A society engaged in training candidates for Central and State Government services was treated as carrying on non-commercial activity, not a profit-oriented Commercial Coaching Service, for the stay application. The Tribunal relied on the organisation&#039;s non-profit character, balance sheet material, and income-tax exemption evidence to conclude that the service tax dispute did not justify insisting on pre-deposit at that stage, and it granted waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery until final disposal. It also directed out-of-turn hearing, noting that the amount in dispute crossed the prescribed monetary threshold, and required the Commissioner to file comments and a counter to the appeal grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>