<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1201 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288177</link>
    <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed merely because the selling dealer&#039;s registration certificate was later cancelled, where the assessee had disclosed the purchases, supported them with documents and objections, and the orders did not find the purchases doubtful or incorrect. The governing provision did not authorise denial of credit on that sole basis. If tax was paid to the selling dealer and the claim was otherwise accepted, the proper course is for the Department to proceed against the dealer in accordance with law. The assessment orders were set aside and the writ petitions were allowed, with liberty to proceed against the dealers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 10:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1201 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288177</link>
      <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed merely because the selling dealer&#039;s registration certificate was later cancelled, where the assessee had disclosed the purchases, supported them with documents and objections, and the orders did not find the purchases doubtful or incorrect. The governing provision did not authorise denial of credit on that sole basis. If tax was paid to the selling dealer and the claim was otherwise accepted, the proper course is for the Department to proceed against the dealer in accordance with law. The assessment orders were set aside and the writ petitions were allowed, with liberty to proceed against the dealers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>