<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 514 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, confirming the addition of commission income based on clear evidence. However, it found a lack of application of mind by the Assessing Officer in adding other alleged escaped incomes, leading to the deletion of those additions. The appeals were partly allowed, affirming the commission income addition and removing other unwarranted additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2020 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 514 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, confirming the addition of commission income based on clear evidence. However, it found a lack of application of mind by the Assessing Officer in adding other alleged escaped incomes, leading to the deletion of those additions. The appeals were partly allowed, affirming the commission income addition and removing other unwarranted additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>