<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 512 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the total income assessment by the AO, based on DRP directions. It affirmed the addition to total income for IT-enabled services below arm&#039;s length price. The final assessment order was deemed valid. The Tribunal supported the TPO&#039;s economic analysis and use of relevant year data. Various filters were addressed, with adjustments directed for comparables and operating margins. Specific companies were excluded from comparison due to dissimilarities. Issues like risk profile adjustments and interest on receivables were discussed. The appeal was partly allowed, with certain matters remanded for reconsideration by the AO/TPO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2020 10:43:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 512 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the total income assessment by the AO, based on DRP directions. It affirmed the addition to total income for IT-enabled services below arm&#039;s length price. The final assessment order was deemed valid. The Tribunal supported the TPO&#039;s economic analysis and use of relevant year data. Various filters were addressed, with adjustments directed for comparables and operating margins. Specific companies were excluded from comparison due to dissimilarities. Issues like risk profile adjustments and interest on receivables were discussed. The appeal was partly allowed, with certain matters remanded for reconsideration by the AO/TPO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>