<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal and affirming that VAT paid using subsidy Challans should not form part of the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The decision was based on the interpretation that actual payment of VAT, including through subsidy Challans, should be deducted from the transaction value, aligning with established legal principles and previous judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2020 10:31:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal and affirming that VAT paid using subsidy Challans should not form part of the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The decision was based on the interpretation that actual payment of VAT, including through subsidy Challans, should be deducted from the transaction value, aligning with established legal principles and previous judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>