https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288159 The tribunal found the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to be maintainable. The petition was admitted, and a moratorium was declared, appointing an Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional to oversee the corporate insolvency resolution process. The tribunal determined that there was valid service of demand notice and no evidence of a prior dispute, leading to the continuation of the insolvency proceedings. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 May 2020 10:14:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288159 The tribunal found the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 to be maintainable. The petition was admitted, and a moratorium was declared, appointing an Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional to oversee the corporate insolvency resolution process. The tribunal determined that there was valid service of demand notice and no evidence of a prior dispute, leading to the continuation of the insolvency proceedings. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288159