https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288152 A statutory tenant under the Bombay Rent Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 had no estate or transferable interest after determination of the contractual tenancy, so a licence created by that tenant was invalid if granted without a subsisting interest in the premises. Earlier authority distinguishing statutory from contractual tenancy was applied, and protection available under another rent statute was treated as inapplicable because the Bombay Act contained no corresponding provision conferring transferable rights. The licence therefore could not support protection under Section 15A in execution proceedings, and a licence is revoked where the grantor has already lost all interest in the property before the grant. The respondent was not protected as a licensee. en-us Thu, 29 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 May 2020 16:28:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288152 A statutory tenant under the Bombay Rent Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 had no estate or transferable interest after determination of the contractual tenancy, so a licence created by that tenant was invalid if granted without a subsisting interest in the premises. Earlier authority distinguishing statutory from contractual tenancy was applied, and protection available under another rent statute was treated as inapplicable because the Bombay Act contained no corresponding provision conferring transferable rights. The licence therefore could not support protection under Section 15A in execution proceedings, and a licence is revoked where the grantor has already lost all interest in the property before the grant. The respondent was not protected as a licensee. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288152