<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 95 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22348</link>
    <description>Premiums paid by the deceased within two years before death on insurance policies taken under the Married Women&#039;s Property Act were not treated as gifts to the beneficiaries. As the payments were made in discharge of the deceased&#039;s obligation and did not attract the gift-based charging provisions, they were excluded from the principal value of the estate under the Estate Duty Act, 1953. The estate duty computation therefore did not include those premia, and the reference was answered in favour of the accountable person.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:58:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 95 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22348</link>
      <description>Premiums paid by the deceased within two years before death on insurance policies taken under the Married Women&#039;s Property Act were not treated as gifts to the beneficiaries. As the payments were made in discharge of the deceased&#039;s obligation and did not attract the gift-based charging provisions, they were excluded from the principal value of the estate under the Estate Duty Act, 1953. The estate duty computation therefore did not include those premia, and the reference was answered in favour of the accountable person.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>