<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 476 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395443</link>
    <description>Detention-certificate relief for waiver of demurrage and transshipment charges was declined because no recognised ground for issue of the certificate was established on the material before the Court. The dispute also involved whether disruption in customs transshipment operations caused delay not attributable to the importer; that factual question required verification, so it was remitted to the customs authority for fresh determination. Pending that inquiry, the amounts due to the cargo custodians were directed to be paid. The operative position was that compensation or waiver based on customs delay depends on properly established facts and cannot be granted as a matter of course.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 476 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395443</link>
      <description>Detention-certificate relief for waiver of demurrage and transshipment charges was declined because no recognised ground for issue of the certificate was established on the material before the Court. The dispute also involved whether disruption in customs transshipment operations caused delay not attributable to the importer; that factual question required verification, so it was remitted to the customs authority for fresh determination. Pending that inquiry, the amounts due to the cargo custodians were directed to be paid. The operative position was that compensation or waiver based on customs delay depends on properly established facts and cannot be granted as a matter of course.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>