<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1175 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288136</link>
    <description>Central excise civil appeal was dismissed both for delay and on merits, with no further reasoning recorded in the text. The order therefore indicates that the challenge did not survive either the procedural objection of delay or the substantive review of the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 18:58:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1175 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288136</link>
      <description>Central excise civil appeal was dismissed both for delay and on merits, with no further reasoning recorded in the text. The order therefore indicates that the challenge did not survive either the procedural objection of delay or the substantive review of the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>