https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22342 The High Court affirmed the appellate court's decision, declaring a lease transaction as sham due to lack of evidence supporting its validity. The court dismissed arguments on benami ownership and possession, emphasizing the need for substantial proof. The judgment highlighted the importance of evidence in legal claims and upheld the lower court's ruling in favor of the plaintiff. en-us Wed, 21 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:47:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22342 The High Court affirmed the appellate court's decision, declaring a lease transaction as sham due to lack of evidence supporting its validity. The court dismissed arguments on benami ownership and possession, emphasizing the need for substantial proof. The judgment highlighted the importance of evidence in legal claims and upheld the lower court's ruling in favor of the plaintiff. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 21 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22342