<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 462 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395429</link>
    <description>The appeals challenged penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for credit card expenses incurred for another company&#039;s business. In both cases, the tribunal found no evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars by the assesses. The penalties were directed to be deleted, emphasizing the necessity to establish concealment or inaccuracies before levying penalties under the said provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 462 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395429</link>
      <description>The appeals challenged penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for credit card expenses incurred for another company&#039;s business. In both cases, the tribunal found no evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars by the assesses. The penalties were directed to be deleted, emphasizing the necessity to establish concealment or inaccuracies before levying penalties under the said provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>