<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 448 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all miscellaneous applications, modified the final order, and allowed the appeal by way of remand. The judgment emphasizes the importance of considering exemptions and re-quantifying duty liability in accordance with applicable notifications and court directives. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for re-quantification of duty liability, granting the appellant liberty to approach the concerned authority for re-quantification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 448 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all miscellaneous applications, modified the final order, and allowed the appeal by way of remand. The judgment emphasizes the importance of considering exemptions and re-quantifying duty liability in accordance with applicable notifications and court directives. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for re-quantification of duty liability, granting the appellant liberty to approach the concerned authority for re-quantification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>