https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395414 A writ challenge to an assessment order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was not examined on merits because the petitioner stated that a Section 84 application had already been filed and was pending. In that situation, the court directed the respondent to consider the application on its own merits within a fixed time, after giving a personal hearing. Coercive recovery was kept in abeyance until disposal of the application, and the directions were made conditional on the application having been filed and remaining pending. en-us Tue, 19 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2020 10:39:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395414 A writ challenge to an assessment order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act was not examined on merits because the petitioner stated that a Section 84 application had already been filed and was pending. In that situation, the court directed the respondent to consider the application on its own merits within a fixed time, after giving a personal hearing. Coercive recovery was kept in abeyance until disposal of the application, and the directions were made conditional on the application having been filed and remaining pending. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 19 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395414