<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 364 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288129</link>
    <description>The court granted the applicants leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to prosecute two original suits against a company under winding-up. The suits were transferred from the original court to the court overseeing the winding-up proceedings to avoid wasteful expenditure and ensure efficient resolution of disputes. The court also stayed the transfer order for four weeks and expedited the issuance of copies of the judgment for necessary action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 10:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 364 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288129</link>
      <description>The court granted the applicants leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to prosecute two original suits against a company under winding-up. The suits were transferred from the original court to the court overseeing the winding-up proceedings to avoid wasteful expenditure and ensure efficient resolution of disputes. The court also stayed the transfer order for four weeks and expedited the issuance of copies of the judgment for necessary action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>