<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 993 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288128</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Notice of Motion, ruling that the suit in rem was maintainable. The Court found no material misrepresentation or fraud warranting dismissal, emphasizing the plaintiffs had established a prima facie arguable case. The matter was deemed fit for trial, leading to the dismissal of the motion with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 10:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 993 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288128</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Notice of Motion, ruling that the suit in rem was maintainable. The Court found no material misrepresentation or fraud warranting dismissal, emphasizing the plaintiffs had established a prima facie arguable case. The matter was deemed fit for trial, leading to the dismissal of the motion with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>