<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 717 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288127</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case where an employee was removed from service following a flawed disciplinary process. The Court found that the charge sheet and show cause notice were not properly served, as the documents sent via registered post were not tendered to the employee. Additionally, attempting to serve the show cause notice through a newspaper publication was deemed inadequate. Emphasizing the necessity of actual service in disciplinary proceedings, the Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the improper service of crucial documents invalidated the entire disciplinary process. No costs were awarded in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 10:12:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 717 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288127</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case where an employee was removed from service following a flawed disciplinary process. The Court found that the charge sheet and show cause notice were not properly served, as the documents sent via registered post were not tendered to the employee. Additionally, attempting to serve the show cause notice through a newspaper publication was deemed inadequate. Emphasizing the necessity of actual service in disciplinary proceedings, the Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the improper service of crucial documents invalidated the entire disciplinary process. No costs were awarded in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>