https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288125 Deletion of the non-obstante clause in Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act did not remove the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes over licensor-licensee disputes concerning possession and licence fees, because the amended scheme and statutory purpose continued to reserve such matters to that special forum. A petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was therefore not maintainable for relief relating to possession and security, since private arbitration cannot displace an exclusive statutory forum created for a defined class of disputes. The special forum continued to govern, and arbitral recourse was excluded by necessary implication. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2020 09:51:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288125 Deletion of the non-obstante clause in Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act did not remove the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes over licensor-licensee disputes concerning possession and licence fees, because the amended scheme and statutory purpose continued to reserve such matters to that special forum. A petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was therefore not maintainable for relief relating to possession and security, since private arbitration cannot displace an exclusive statutory forum created for a defined class of disputes. The special forum continued to govern, and arbitral recourse was excluded by necessary implication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288125