<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288118</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition converted into a Civil Appeal, upholding the denial of exemption claimed by the Appellant under a specific Notification. The Appellant subsequently filed a Suit for Recovery in the Delhi High Court. Following a Tribunal order granting exemption to another party, the High Court allowed the Appellant to approach the Tribunal for rectification of excise duty liabilities. The Tribunal, considering the doctrine of merger, held it lacked jurisdiction to review its previous decision, advising the Appellant to seek modifications from the Supreme Court. Temporary protection against coercive action for recovery of excise duty was granted by the Tribunal for a limited period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 09:46:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1777 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288118</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition converted into a Civil Appeal, upholding the denial of exemption claimed by the Appellant under a specific Notification. The Appellant subsequently filed a Suit for Recovery in the Delhi High Court. Following a Tribunal order granting exemption to another party, the High Court allowed the Appellant to approach the Tribunal for rectification of excise duty liabilities. The Tribunal, considering the doctrine of merger, held it lacked jurisdiction to review its previous decision, advising the Appellant to seek modifications from the Supreme Court. Temporary protection against coercive action for recovery of excise duty was granted by the Tribunal for a limited period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>