https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288111 The court concluded that personal service of notice under the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act is not mandatory if the notice is deemed or presumed to have been served. It is not necessary for the plaintiff to prove the endorsement of refusal by producing the postman or other evidence. The courts were correct in raising the presumption under the Evidence Act in favor of the landlord, which should also be made under the General Clauses Act. The appeal was directed to the single Judge for decision. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 May 2020 16:34:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288111 The court concluded that personal service of notice under the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act is not mandatory if the notice is deemed or presumed to have been served. It is not necessary for the plaintiff to prove the endorsement of refusal by producing the postman or other evidence. The courts were correct in raising the presumption under the Evidence Act in favor of the landlord, which should also be made under the General Clauses Act. The appeal was directed to the single Judge for decision. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 04 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288111