https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288108 The Supreme Court held that respondent No. 1 is precluded from raising the issue of interpolation in the agreement dated 02.09.1978. The High Court's decision allowing respondent No. 1 to re-agitate the issue was overturned. Respondent No. 1 was restricted from challenging the authenticity of the agreement, and any evidence related to interpolation or forgery was deemed inadmissible in the trial court. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 May 2020 15:48:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288108 The Supreme Court held that respondent No. 1 is precluded from raising the issue of interpolation in the agreement dated 02.09.1978. The High Court's decision allowing respondent No. 1 to re-agitate the issue was overturned. Respondent No. 1 was restricted from challenging the authenticity of the agreement, and any evidence related to interpolation or forgery was deemed inadmissible in the trial court. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288108