https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288107 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the Additional District Judge and upholding the trial court's decision. It found that the plaintiff had no real concern with the disputed property, as evidenced by her lack of involvement and contradictory statements. The court concluded that the plaintiff's claim of benami ownership was unfounded, considering her actions and the evidence presented. Therefore, the suit was deemed not maintainable, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the defendants. en-us Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 May 2020 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288107 The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the Additional District Judge and upholding the trial court's decision. It found that the plaintiff had no real concern with the disputed property, as evidenced by her lack of involvement and contradictory statements. The court concluded that the plaintiff's claim of benami ownership was unfounded, considering her actions and the evidence presented. Therefore, the suit was deemed not maintainable, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the defendants. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288107