<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 415 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288106</link>
    <description>A Supreme Court matter concerning central excise titled Collector v. M.R.F. Ltd. is recorded with the judges&#039; names and date; the only operative entry in the supplied text is that the appeal was dismissed. The document does not supply factual background, legal issues addressed, statutory interpretation, or reasoning. No substantive legal principles or holdings beyond the procedural outcome are provided in the text available for summary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 14:05:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 415 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288106</link>
      <description>A Supreme Court matter concerning central excise titled Collector v. M.R.F. Ltd. is recorded with the judges&#039; names and date; the only operative entry in the supplied text is that the appeal was dismissed. The document does not supply factual background, legal issues addressed, statutory interpretation, or reasoning. No substantive legal principles or holdings beyond the procedural outcome are provided in the text available for summary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>