<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22330</link>
    <description>HC held that Explanation to s.73 of the Income-tax Act creates a legal fiction deeming the business of purchase and sale of shares by certain companies as &quot;speculation business&quot; for the limited purpose of s.73, irrespective of actual delivery and the definition of speculative transaction under s.43(5). The Explanation applies to companies other than investment, banking or money-lending companies and covers even cases where share trading is the sole business activity. Accordingly, the loss from share trading incurred by the assessee-company was to be treated as speculation loss, not a normal business loss, and could be set off only against speculation profits. Both questions were answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22330</link>
      <description>HC held that Explanation to s.73 of the Income-tax Act creates a legal fiction deeming the business of purchase and sale of shares by certain companies as &quot;speculation business&quot; for the limited purpose of s.73, irrespective of actual delivery and the definition of speculative transaction under s.43(5). The Explanation applies to companies other than investment, banking or money-lending companies and covers even cases where share trading is the sole business activity. Accordingly, the loss from share trading incurred by the assessee-company was to be treated as speculation loss, not a normal business loss, and could be set off only against speculation profits. Both questions were answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>