<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395392</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the appellant against the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the financial creditor&#039;s application was time-barred as it was filed beyond the three-year limitation period from the date the corporate debtor&#039;s account became a non-performing asset. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable under section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as the appellant had already appealed against the admission order and seeking a stay of proceedings constituted unnecessary litigation. Consequently, the appeal was deemed not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 425 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395392</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the appellant against the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the financial creditor&#039;s application was time-barred as it was filed beyond the three-year limitation period from the date the corporate debtor&#039;s account became a non-performing asset. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable under section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as the appellant had already appealed against the admission order and seeking a stay of proceedings constituted unnecessary litigation. Consequently, the appeal was deemed not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>