<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 424 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395391</link>
    <description>Limitation for a Section 7 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act as applied by Section 238A, so time runs from the date of default and can be extended only by a legally valid acknowledgment or other recognised mode under the Limitation Act. No valid acknowledgment was shown, so the debt was already time-barred when the insolvency application was filed. A recovery decree did not amount to acknowledgment, did not create a fresh default date, and could not revive limitation or convert insolvency into a substitute for execution. The application was therefore rejected as time-barred and the CIRP initiation set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 424 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395391</link>
      <description>Limitation for a Section 7 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act as applied by Section 238A, so time runs from the date of default and can be extended only by a legally valid acknowledgment or other recognised mode under the Limitation Act. No valid acknowledgment was shown, so the debt was already time-barred when the insolvency application was filed. A recovery decree did not amount to acknowledgment, did not create a fresh default date, and could not revive limitation or convert insolvency into a substitute for execution. The application was therefore rejected as time-barred and the CIRP initiation set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>