<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1326 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288093</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal decided to transfer a petition to the Delhi High Court due to pending winding up proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the need to prioritize the winding up proceedings over insolvency proceedings to avoid conflicts between statutory entities and ensure an efficient resolution process. The judgment underscores the importance of coordination in legal proceedings to uphold integrity and protect the interests of all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 09:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1326 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288093</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal decided to transfer a petition to the Delhi High Court due to pending winding up proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the need to prioritize the winding up proceedings over insolvency proceedings to avoid conflicts between statutory entities and ensure an efficient resolution process. The judgment underscores the importance of coordination in legal proceedings to uphold integrity and protect the interests of all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>