<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1485 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288099</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the reassessment order and ruling against the Revenue on substantial questions of law. The reassessment was deemed invalid due to lack of tangible material for reopening. The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s right to challenge the reassessment&#039;s validity under Rule 27 and did not delve into the merits of relief under Section 80-I as the reassessment annulment made it unnecessary to address.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1485 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288099</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the reassessment order and ruling against the Revenue on substantial questions of law. The reassessment was deemed invalid due to lack of tangible material for reopening. The Court upheld the assessee&#039;s right to challenge the reassessment&#039;s validity under Rule 27 and did not delve into the merits of relief under Section 80-I as the reassessment annulment made it unnecessary to address.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>