<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 411 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395378</link>
    <description>The court held that extra realization due to exchange rate fluctuation should be considered part of the export turnover. Additionally, export sale proceeds received in accordance with the contract and RBI&#039;s approval cannot be disregarded for Section 80-HHC relief. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration in light of subsequent developments, including the RBI&#039;s order. The appeal was successful, and the previous order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 411 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395378</link>
      <description>The court held that extra realization due to exchange rate fluctuation should be considered part of the export turnover. Additionally, export sale proceeds received in accordance with the contract and RBI&#039;s approval cannot be disregarded for Section 80-HHC relief. The matter was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration in light of subsequent developments, including the RBI&#039;s order. The appeal was successful, and the previous order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>