<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 400 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2000-01 and 2004-05. It confirmed some additions related to unexplained cash, investments, and expenses but deleted others due to lack of relevance to the assessment year or authenticity issues. Additionally, the Tribunal restricted the AO from enhancing income beyond the original assessment in set-aside proceedings, allowing only limited verification by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 10:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 400 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2000-01 and 2004-05. It confirmed some additions related to unexplained cash, investments, and expenses but deleted others due to lack of relevance to the assessment year or authenticity issues. Additionally, the Tribunal restricted the AO from enhancing income beyond the original assessment in set-aside proceedings, allowing only limited verification by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>