<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1765 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288087</link>
    <description>Tea sold through auctioneers for export was treated as eligible for exemption under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, where the sales were found to be pre-export sales covered by an earlier decision on the same issue. The Madras High Court noted that the present dispute was identical to that prior ruling, and therefore the impugned assessment could not be sustained. The order was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh assessment in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1765 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288087</link>
      <description>Tea sold through auctioneers for export was treated as eligible for exemption under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, where the sales were found to be pre-export sales covered by an earlier decision on the same issue. The Madras High Court noted that the present dispute was identical to that prior ruling, and therefore the impugned assessment could not be sustained. The order was quashed and the matter remanded for fresh assessment in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>