<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1765 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288087</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition filed by an Industrial Co-operative Society, quashing the impugned order and remanding the matter to the first respondent for reassessment. The Court found that the Form H declaration provided was sufficient for verifying export and granting exemption under Section 5(3) of the CST Act, 1956. The Court emphasized the importance of compliance with registration and verification processes, highlighting the negative impact of reopening assessments on the exemption benefits granted by the Government. The Additional Government Pleader agreed with the legal position, referencing the precedent set in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1765 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288087</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition filed by an Industrial Co-operative Society, quashing the impugned order and remanding the matter to the first respondent for reassessment. The Court found that the Form H declaration provided was sufficient for verifying export and granting exemption under Section 5(3) of the CST Act, 1956. The Court emphasized the importance of compliance with registration and verification processes, highlighting the negative impact of reopening assessments on the exemption benefits granted by the Government. The Additional Government Pleader agreed with the legal position, referencing the precedent set in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>