https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288082 In assessment proceedings for lands alleged to have been added by alluvion, the governing revenue scheme permitted assessment of the accreted land, and the objector had to show a fundamental statutory irregularity to defeat the proceedings. The comparative use of earlier maps, on-site inspection, and preparation of a superimposed map were treated as sufficient compliance; the absence of a separate standalone map did not by itself establish invalidity. Because the objections went only to factual and procedural matters within the revenue authorities' competence, the challenge to the assessment failed and the assessment of the accreted lands was upheld. en-us Fri, 02 May 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2020 18:04:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288082 In assessment proceedings for lands alleged to have been added by alluvion, the governing revenue scheme permitted assessment of the accreted land, and the objector had to show a fundamental statutory irregularity to defeat the proceedings. The comparative use of earlier maps, on-site inspection, and preparation of a superimposed map were treated as sufficient compliance; the absence of a separate standalone map did not by itself establish invalidity. Because the objections went only to factual and procedural matters within the revenue authorities' competence, the challenge to the assessment failed and the assessment of the accreted lands was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 May 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288082