https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288078 The court refused to grant an injunction to the plaintiffs in a trademark infringement and passing off case involving the mark "ARROW." The defendants successfully argued prior use and honest adoption of the mark since 1985, establishing a strong prima facie case. The court noted the plaintiffs' delay and non-use of the mark in India, finding that granting an injunction would cause irreparable harm to the defendants' established business. Instead, the court directed the defendants to maintain and forward annual profits to the plaintiffs, ultimately disposing of the motion with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2020 16:44:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288078 The court refused to grant an injunction to the plaintiffs in a trademark infringement and passing off case involving the mark "ARROW." The defendants successfully argued prior use and honest adoption of the mark since 1985, establishing a strong prima facie case. The court noted the plaintiffs' delay and non-use of the mark in India, finding that granting an injunction would cause irreparable harm to the defendants' established business. Instead, the court directed the defendants to maintain and forward annual profits to the plaintiffs, ultimately disposing of the motion with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288078