<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 843 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263, finding errors in the assessment related to deductions under sections 80-O and 80HHC. The Tribunal ruled that the technical know-how was not exclusively used outside India, leading to the denial of deduction under section 80-O. However, the inclusion of excise duty and sales tax in the total turnover for deduction under section 80HHC was deemed incorrect. The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the issue of deduction under section 80-O for reassessment. The assessee&#039;s appeal and cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 14:15:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 843 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s jurisdiction under section 263, finding errors in the assessment related to deductions under sections 80-O and 80HHC. The Tribunal ruled that the technical know-how was not exclusively used outside India, leading to the denial of deduction under section 80-O. However, the inclusion of excise duty and sales tax in the total turnover for deduction under section 80HHC was deemed incorrect. The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the issue of deduction under section 80-O for reassessment. The assessee&#039;s appeal and cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>